Security Implications Of Climate-Induced Migration

Climate-induced migration is the relocation of people prompted by environmental instability and issues brought forth by climate change. Not only does this bring about problems for those migrating, such as racism, but creates setbacks for those already living in the area, such as overpopulation and resource scarcity. These can quickly escalate tensions and potentially lead to conflicts among the people, as well as increasing risk of political unrest and violence.

These challenges caught the attention of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which is tasked with the responsibility of maintaining international peace and security, ensuring relevant parties settle disputes through peaceful means. Our UNSC committee at CIAMUN took it upon themselves to gather and suggest solutions for our problem at hand.

However, before our delegates were able to come up with effective resolutions, they were hit with a dinosaur crisis.

Yes, you heard that right. Dinosaurs.

Climate change had intensified, melting ice caps which released an unknown species of hyper-intelligent dinosaurs with superpowers! So far having been discovered in remote areas such as Siberia and Antarctica, the dinosaurs revealed their intention to team up with China, Australia and Russia to take over the world.

Joined with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and a dinosaur representing the ‘Dinosaurian Federation’, the UNSC committee were tasked with finding solutions for the issue to ensure the safety and well-being of the humans and satisfaction of the dinosaurs. This led to the countries being split into two based on what they believed could be done to overcome the problem at hand.

UK, USA, India and France suggested an approach to be at peace with the dinosaurs, allowing them to reside in areas allocated for them, which is promised to expand as humans would soon migrate to Mars after the Mars mission and its ability of sustain future life is confirmed.

However, eight countries opposed that proposition and submitted a directive allowing dinosaurs to decimate and destroy the entire world, except for the members of the Dinosaurian Federation, which ultimately won. They believed it would prove to be beneficial to the Earth as dinosaurs are eco-friendly and would allow nature to thrive as it did before.

After the dinosaurs were dealt with, it was time to turn their attentions back to the problem that brought the committee together in the first place: climate-induced migration. But just before the countries were able to split into blocs, things got truly interesting when China proposed a two versus two debate with North Korea against India and USA.

The two sides battled with each other, criticizing one another for their careless methods of handing immigrants and environmental problems. One of the chairs claimed, “it was quite an intriguing discussion as all four delegates brought forth amazing points and guided the committee into the resolution part.” Eventually, the debate concluded with China and North Korea emerging as the winners.

When time came for resolutions to be devised, the countries split into two blocs, each with different ideas to combat our obstacle.

Bloc A, consisting of India, Australia, Saudi Arabia, USA and Bangladesh, asked countries to create a legal framework to protect climate refugees, encourage the development of sustainable infrastructure, and member states to raise awareness and promote ESG companies. Additionally, they suggested that developed countries provide aid to developing or underdeveloped countries and the UNSC to change laws placed along the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol to ensure climate refugees have equal rights as normal refugees.

Similarly, Pakistan, Russia, Myanmar and China proposed that member states invest in renewable energy sources, promote sustainable infrastructure and create policies to help their countries transition towards sustainable economic growth models. Furthermore, they advocated for member states to forge partnerships with international organizations to address the problem, UN to fund regions most effected by the problem, and the Secretary-General to submit regular reports on the matter for further consideration.

After carrying out the vote, it was Bloc A’s solutions that prevailed and passed! With their excellent ideas, the resolution would surely prove to be effective and ensure a safe and healthy planet for all!

This marked the end of our fruitful conference, guaranteed to have supported our future leaders in the development of their viewpoints and ideas on the world. Whether the problem involves ensuring the safety of those affected by climate change or even dealing with a dinosaur takeover, one takeaway from this conference can be that optimal solutions can only truly be forged through cooperation and confidence.

​